Submission rejected on 9 March 2026 by DoubleGrazing (talk).

Rejected by DoubleGrazing 6 months ago. Last edited by 331dot 5 months ago.

Submission declined on 7 March 2026 by ChrysGalley (talk).

This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

Declined by ChrysGalley 6 months ago.

Submission declined on 3 March 2026 by Bonadea (talk).

This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

Declined by Bonadea 6 months ago.

Submission declined on 27 February 2026 by Pythoncoder (talk).

This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

Declined by Pythoncoder 6 months ago.

Submission declined on 9 February 2026 by OrangeWaylon (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by OrangeWaylon 7 months ago.

Submission declined on 2 February 2026 by DoubleGrazing (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for web content. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by DoubleGrazing 7 months ago.

Comment: Just rewording a few things does not get rid of the AI's draft. This is still something essentially written by LLM. Apart from being against Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, it simply does not deliver on the requirement for a neutral and accurate summary of reliable sources. This just name-checks references rather than summarising them. ChrysGalley (talk) 21:40, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Datingscout is a website testing and reviewing dating sites and apps before providing tailored recommendations to their readers. ^[1]

It was founded in 2011 by author Chris Pleines who co-wrote Online-Dating für Dummies (2021), published by Wiley-VCH.^[2]

Datingscout team tests special features and pricing reviewing more than 1,500 dating sites in more than 13 countries including the US.^[3]

In 2018, the platform is one of the first to use artificial intelligence to study 22 million profile pictures of Tinder users. ^[4]^[5]

References