Draft:Agent S
Submission declined on 3 November 2026 by Chaotic Enby (talk). This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate, draft, or rewrite article content.
Please delete the portions which were LLM-generated, and summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. If you have used an LLM but you believe that your use is covered by one of the two exceptions (basic copyediting and translation between two languages in which you are fully fluent), please provide a transcript of the prompt(s) you used while writing your draft (see the how-to guide). Reviewers can make mistakes. If you have not received any LLM assistance, you may seek a second opinion at the AfC Help Desk. See the advice page on large language models for more information.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Comment: Besides the WP:NOLLM aspect, there's a lot of reliance on primary and non-independent sources (e.g. interviews, research papers from the same authors) which don't establish notability. Chaotic Enby (in solidarity · talk · contribs) 01:19, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Comment: In preparing this draft, I disclose that AI assistance was used as follows: The initial draft was written with Sai, an AI agent made by Simular (my employer, which also develops Agent S). I chose the sources from an earlier source review, and Sai wrote the wikitext from them. I read it through and asked Sai for changes, including plainer, less promotional wording and replacing self-published sources with conference listings where possible. I then checked the claims against the cited sources. The chat transcript is not publicly shareable. Samgyw (talk) 09:11, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
| Agent S | |
|---|---|
| Developer | Simular |
| Release | October 2024 |
| Written in | Python |
| Type | AI agent framework |
| License | Apache License 2.0 |
| Repository | github |
Agent S is an open-source framework for building computer-use agents. These are programs that operate a computer the way a person does, by reading the screen and using the mouse and keyboard.[1][2] It is developed by researchers at the startup Simular.[3] Four versions have been released since October 2024. Each is described in a research paper and tested on the OSWorld benchmark.[4][5] The code is published on GitHub under the Apache License 2.0.[6]
History
[edit]Agent S
[edit]Saaket Agashe, Jiuzhou Han, Shuyu Gan, Jiachen Yang, Ang Li and Xin Eric Wang posted the first Agent S paper to arXiv on 10 October 2024.[1] It was accepted as a poster at the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) in 2025.[7] The Decoder covered the release that month and noted that the Python code was free to download from GitHub.[2]
Agent S2
[edit]The Agent S2 paper followed on 1 April 2025.[8] Wired covered it that month, focusing on how the agent switches between AI models depending on the task.[3] The paper was accepted at the Conference on Language Modeling (COLM) in 2025.[9] In July 2025, The Register reported that Agent S2 ranked fourth on the OSWorld leaderboard and sixth on AndroidWorld.[10]
Agent S3
[edit]Agent S3 came out in October 2025, in a paper titled "Scaling Agents for Computer Use".[11] The Chinese technology publication 机器之心 (Synced) reported that it was built directly on Agent S2, with a simpler framework and a built-in coding agent.[4] The paper was accepted by the journal Transactions on Machine Learning Research (TMLR) in 2026.[12]
Agent S4
[edit]The Agent S4 paper, "Evolving Agent Interfaces", was posted on 20 October 2026.[5]
Architecture
[edit]The first version breaks a task into smaller steps before acting. To plan those steps, it searches for outside knowledge and looks up how it handled similar tasks before. Its authors call this experience-augmented hierarchical planning.[1][2] It also uses an agent-computer interface (ACI), which the authors designed to help agents built on multimodal large language models reason about the screen and control it.[1] An independent 2025 survey of GUI agents describes Agent S as turning user instructions into detailed subtasks, ordered so that each step comes after the steps it depends on.[13]
Agent S2 splits the work between a general model and specialist models. The paper uses a technique called Mixture-of-Grounding to find elements on the screen precisely. A second technique, Proactive Hierarchical Planning, revises the plan at several time scales as the screen changes.[8] Simular co-founder Ang Li told The Register that once the agent finds a way to do a task, it turns those actions into symbolic code that runs the same way each time. When that code stops working, the agent goes back to the language model.[10]
A computer-use agent can succeed at a task on one run and fail on the next. Agent S3 runs several attempts in parallel and keeps the best one. Its selection method, Behavior Judge (BJudge), writes a short account of what each attempt did and compares those accounts.[11][4] Agent S4 adds a meta-agent, a second agent that studies the task agent's attempts on practice tasks and builds a library of interfaces and notes on how to use them. Different versions of the library compete, and the ones that do best on tasks the meta-agent has not seen are developed further.[5]
Benchmarks
[edit]On OSWorld, the first Agent S paper reported a success rate 9.37 percentage points above the baseline it was compared with.[1] Synced reported OSWorld scores of 20.6% for Agent S and 48.8% for Agent S2.[4] It gave 69.9% for Agent S3 at release, against a human score of about 72%.[4] The current version of the Agent S3 paper reports 72.6% when several attempts are run, against a human score of 72.36%.[11]
The Agent S2 paper also reported results on WindowsAgentArena and AndroidWorld, with relative improvements of 52.8% and 16.52% over the previous best methods.[8] The Agent S4 paper reports a binary score of 21.3% on OSWorld V2 using the open-weight Qwen3.8-27B model.[5]
Reception
[edit]The Decoder described Agent S as an attempt to take over routine office work such as data entry and scheduling.[2] It also reported the developers' own finding that about 40 percent of failures came from weak task planning or from matching commands to the wrong screen elements.[2] Wired wrote about Agent S2's use of more than one AI model.[3] Synced covered Agent S3 at length. It named inconsistent results from one run to the next as a main obstacle for computer-use agents, and explained how running attempts in parallel reduces it.[4]
Other researchers have used Agent S in their own work. The authors of OSWorld-Human, a benchmark that measures how efficiently computer-use agents work, studied Agent S2's runs on 39 OSWorld tasks to find where delays come from.[14] As of 2 November 2026, the GitHub repository had about 12,850 stars and 1,500 forks.[6]
References
[edit]- 1 2 3 4 5 Agashe, Saaket; Han, Jiuzhou; Gan, Shuyu; Yang, Jiachen; Li, Ang; Wang, Xin Eric (10 October 2024). "Agent S: An Open Agentic Framework that Uses Computers Like a Human". arXiv:2410.08164 [cs.AI].
- 1 2 3 4 5 Kemper, Jonathan (22 October 2024). "Agent S AI system automates complex computer tasks". The Decoder. Retrieved 2 November 2026.
- 1 2 3 Knight, Will (16 April 2025). "Meet the AI Agent With Multiple Personalities". Wired. Retrieved 2 November 2026.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 机器之心编辑部 (6 October 2025). "你敢信?GPT-5的电脑操作水平只比人类低2%了" [Can you believe it? GPT-5's computer operation level is only 2% below humans]. 机器之心 (Synced) (in Chinese). Retrieved 2 November 2026 – via The Paper.
- 1 2 3 4 Agashe, Saaket; Yang, Yuzhe; Gonzalez-Pumariega, Gonzalo; Koduru, Bhuvan Chandra; Li, Chih-Lun; Yang, Jiachen; Li, Ang; Wang, Xin Eric (20 October 2026). "Evolving Agent Interfaces". arXiv:2610.28601 [cs.AI].
- 1 2 "simular-ai/Agent-S". GitHub. Retrieved 2 November 2026.
- ↑ Agashe, Saaket; Han, Jiuzhou; Gan, Shuyu; Yang, Jiachen; Li, Ang; Wang, Xin Eric (2025). Agent S: An Open Agentic Framework that Uses Computers Like a Human. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2025). OpenReview.
- 1 2 3 Agashe, Saaket; Wong, Kyle; Tu, Vincent; Yang, Jiachen; Li, Ang; Wang, Xin Eric (1 April 2025). "Agent S2: A Compositional Generalist-Specialist Framework for Computer Use Agents". arXiv:2504.00906 [cs.AI].
- ↑ Agashe, Saaket; Wong, Kyle; Tu, Vincent; Yang, Jiachen; Li, Ang; Wang, Xin Eric (2025). Agent S2: A Compositional Generalist-Specialist Framework for Computer Use Agents. Conference on Language Modeling (COLM 2025). OpenReview.
- 1 2 Claburn, Thomas (15 July 2025). "Former Google DeepMind engineer behind Simular says other AI agents are doing it wrong". The Register. Retrieved 2 November 2026.
- 1 2 3 Gonzalez-Pumariega, Gonzalo; Tu, Vincent; Lee, Chih-Lun; Yang, Jiachen; Li, Ang; Wang, Xin Eric (2 October 2025). "Scaling Agents for Computer Use". arXiv:2510.02250 [cs.AI].
- ↑ Gonzalez-Pumariega, Gonzalo; Tu, Vincent; Lee, Chih-Lun; Yang, Jiachen; Li, Ang; Wang, Xin Eric (2026). "Scaling Agents for Computer Use". Transactions on Machine Learning Research.
- ↑ Tang, Fei; Xu, Haolei; Zhang, Hang; et al. (27 March 2025). "A Survey on (M)LLM-Based GUI Agents". arXiv:2504.13865 [cs.HC].
- ↑ Abhyankar, Reyna; Qi, Qi; Zhang, Yiying (19 June 2025). "OSWorld-Human: Benchmarking the Efficiency of Computer-Use Agents". arXiv:2506.16042 [cs.AI].
External links
[edit]- Agent S on GitHub
Category:Free software programmed in Python Category:2024 software

- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements and
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight and
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.