Jump to content

User talk:The Anome

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:The Anomebot2)

Support request with team editing experiment project

[edit]

Dear tech ambassadors, instead of spamming the Village Pump of each Wikipedia about my tiny project proposal for researching team editing (see here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/Research_team_editing), I have decided to leave to your own discretion if the matter is relevant enough to inform a wider audience already. I would appreciate if you could appraise if the Wikipedia community you are more familiar with could have interest in testing group editing "on their own grounds" and with their own guidance. In a nutshell: it consists in editing pages as a group instead of as an individual. This social experiment might involve redefining some aspects of the workflow we are all used to, with the hope of creating a more friendly and collaborative environment since editing under a group umbrella creates less social exposure than traditional "individual editing". I send you this message also as a proof that the Inspire Campaign is already gearing up. As said I would appreciate of *you* just a comment on the talk page/endorsement of my project noting your general perception about the idea. Nothing else. Your contribution helps to shape the future! (which I hope it will be very bright, with colors, and Wikipedia everywhere) Regards from User:Micru on meta.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, The Anome. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

NHRP detaggables

[edit]

So, I ended up here: User:The Anome/NHRP detaggables because of this redirect, Skeleton Cave Massacre Site. I recently created Skeleton Cave (Arizona), and when I was linking other pages to the article, I found the detaggables page. In scanning your list, I came across Work, John, House and Mill Site which I then linked to John Work House and Mill Site which has existed since 2006.

It occurred to me that there may be a number of pages already in existence, but since they are not formatted the same as what's on this page, they aren't being identified as being done. I'm trying to think on how to solve this problem. --evrik (talk)

Notice

The article Punk Bunny Coffee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article reads like an advertisement, and I can barely find any sources following the name change.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Self-trouting for inadvertently deleting the entire Reform UK article

[edit]
a rainbow trout fish

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

The Signpost: 24 August 2026

[edit]
  • On the bright side: The great outdoors
    Blue Angels, Indigenous Peoples' Day, and the Perseids meteor shower.
  • Opinion: Are we embarrassed yet?
    One editor wants to find out more about a Department of Justice investigation of Wikipedia and its editors.
  • Comix: WP:FAOWN
    "Explaining civilly" probably should go both ways...

Tech News: 2026-35

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:43, 24 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Helch

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Helch, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help). Below are the references causing this error:
    • www.mylondon.news https://www.mylondon.news/whats-on/arts-culture-news/unsolved-mystery-helch-london-graffiti-33398235. Retrieved 2026-08-29. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:40, 29 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Helch

[edit]

Wikociewie (talk) 10:45, 30 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-36

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:51, 31 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Chemosensitizer for redirecting to wikt:chemosensitizer

[edit]
icon
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chemosensitizer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be redirected to wikt:chemosensitizer.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chemosensitizer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Jonesey95 (talk) 13:45, 3 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Anomebot2

[edit]

Greetings. Well, once again it's been three months since the bot last added {{coord missing}} to articles. Any word on when its next run will be? Deor (talk) 00:22, 7 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Deor: sorry about not getting back to you earlier - I will try to run it either tonight or tomorrow. The Anome (talk) 16:39, 9 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Noted. Thanks. Deor (talk) 16:50, 9 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
{@Deor: Hi - I 've just cranked the old machine back into action and downloaded the files and started the bot script. However, there is a schema change, and I will have to fix the script before I can process the dump. Tomorrow, I hope. This happens often enough that I should write some code to parse the schemas at the top of the sqldumps and build the regexps automatically instead of by hand, but since the effort of doing this one off exceed the effort of doing a small patch to the code I never get round to it. (Yes, parsing SQL dumps with regexps is a bad idea; but if you only have to do it once a month, it's no big deal, particularly since the regexps are simple, greedy and precompiled). The Anome (talk) 23:12, 10 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
You've lost me with the "SQL dumps" and "regexps" stuff, but thanks anyway. 23:36, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-37

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 18:42, 7 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Robert Jenrick

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Robert Jenrick, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:43, 11 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-38

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 15:29, 14 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – September 2026

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2026).

Administrator changes

added Dclemens1971
readded
removed

Oversight changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

  • Speedy deletion criteria G15 has been renamed from "LLM-generated pages without human review" to "Unambiguously LLM-generated pages" and has an additional sign of detection added to it following a RfC.

Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 16 September 2026

[edit]
  • News and notes: The Balance of Power
    Wikimedia employees unionize, officer departs, The Signpost gains sister on Wiktionary

Hi and sorry for the reverts - about Verus (proof system)

[edit]

Hello, so Verus (proof system) doesn't have enough to justify an independent article at the moment. The Amazon and MS sources are great but not independent, as far as I can tell, as both share authors with the Verus paper. (ed: also AutoVerus shares one author.) It's not totally clear to me that Verus should have an article and not some of the other Rust FV tools out there. I'd love to see more coverage of Rust tools in general and formal verification in particular, so hope I am not coming across wrong

I've added the template:Notability tag for now, if you want to dig up and try to find more secondary sources.

As far as Rust (programming language) goes, I've kept the mention of Verus but added a paragraph listing all notable verification tools for Rust, hopefully to give a more balanced view of the subject. Caleb Stanford (talk) 17:22, 18 September 2026 (UTC)Reply