Jump to content

User talk:Plastikspork

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:SporkBot)
Latest comment: 13 days ago by Qwerfjkl (bot) in topic CS1 error on Gillette Stadium

Undeletion request for Module:Base64

[edit]

You deleted Module:Base64 when closing a brief discussion which indicated that at the time it had no likely use case. A base64 decoder is currently included in both Module:Cite taxon (55281 transclusion) and Module:U.S. Army Cemeteries Explorer. The U.S. Army Cemeteries Explorer is currently linked from 2094 pages, all of which are candidates for replacement with {{U.S. Army Cemeteries Explorer}}. Would you consider undeleting Module:Base64 to minimize code duplication? Daask (talk) 06:36, 19 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Daask: Sure, I have restored it at Module:Base64 since you have found a use for it. Although, what you have in Module:Cite taxon seems less complicated, so maybe there are some improvements that could be made. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:42, 21 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

"Bryan and Troy (American Horror Story)" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Bryan and Troy (American Horror Story) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 6 § Bryan and Troy (American Horror Story) until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 08:12, 6 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Note It looks like I created this after closing this discussion which suggested redirects to replace a more complicated template approach. But, that was over 11 years ago, and I have no opinion now. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:29, 6 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Redirects listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

Redirects you have created have been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether their use and function meet the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on these redirects at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 6 § Marie Jeanne LaLaurie until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 09:01, 6 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your opinion on unexplained tehsil changes

[edit]

Hi there, I noticed you reverted recent changes at Likir which added a redlink category. That user has gone on quite a tear of similar edits, all with nonexistent categories and other errors. I googled it, and there does seem to be some overlap in the names of these tehsils, so I'm not 100% sure this is vandalism, but I DO know those categories are red. :( In your opinion is this something that should be reported as vandalism? Thanks for any assistance, cheers! Jessicapierce (talk) 00:47, 7 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

(talk page watcher) @Jessicapierce: WP:REDNO says Either the category should be created or the non-existent category link should be removed or changed to one that already exists. I would probably start with the last of these - is there another existing category that has some variant of spelling, punctuation or grammar? See for instance Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United Kingdom#Create Category:Schools in United Kingdom where I pointed out that the desired Category:Schools in United Kingdom would be redundant to the existing Category:Schools in the United Kingdom.
If there is no sensible replacement, consider if the redlinked category is desirable. Has it been populated with more than a couple of pages? Could it be made part of a larger structure? Would it survive a CfD? If you can say yes to these, create the category page; see for instance Category:2026 in British women's sport although I don't recall where I saw it redlinked. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 07:07, 7 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! I was tracking down the non-existent templates. When cited information is changed without changing the citation, that is always a red flag. However, it is quite possible that there has been an administrative restructuring of the tehsils, so it would be good to see if there is a source. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:39, 7 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Gillette Stadium

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Gillette Stadium, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help). Below are the references causing this error:
    • https://fun107.com/savannah-bananas-gillette-stadium-foxboro/. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:03, 7 September 2026 (UTC)Reply