User talk:Per exemplum

Note: I am committed to ethical conduct and always assume good faith. If you are here because you believe I made a mistake, please be courteous and make sure you consult WP:POLICYLIST before posting.

New pages patrol September 2026 Backlog drive

September 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 September 2026, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin at a particularly important time for NPP. The backlog has now passed 30,000 unreviewed articles, a level that has been described in current NPP discussions as exceptionally high and potentially difficult to overcome through normal reviewing alone. Backlog drives are one of the few measures that have historically produced a noticeable reduction in the backlog, so the participation of as many active patrollers as possible will matter this month. If you can review during September, please make articles your priority. Every article that is reviewed is a meaningful reduction in the backlog. With the queue at its current size, even a relatively small increase in the number of articles each patroller reviews can add up to a substantial difference over the course of the month. This is a hybrid drive, so redirect reviewing is still included. Redirects can be a useful way for newer patrollers to get comfortable with NPP and can help people build up to reviewing articles. However, the main goal of this drive is to tackle the article backlog, and experienced patrollers are particularly encouraged to spend as much of their available reviewing time on articles as they can. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. If you have been thinking about doing more NPP, this is an especially good month to jump in. Whether you can review a few pages or hundreds, every review helps. And if you are already an active patroller, please consider whether you can put in some additional time during September to help bring the backlog back under control. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:49, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Franz Boas, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Groups of people was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 27 August 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Group of Four Trees (Jean Dubuffet) is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Group of Four Trees (Jean Dubuffet) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Voorts -- Voorts (talk) 02:43, 30 August 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Group of Four Trees (Jean Dubuffet) has failed

Your good article nomination of the article Group of Four Trees (Jean Dubuffet) has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Voorts -- Voorts (talk) 21:24, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

Let me know when you are ready to re-nominate, as I'm interested in reviewing it. Viriditas (talk) 22:00, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

@Viriditas Thank you for offering. I've responded with my objections to qf on the review page, which I wanted to be on the record. I understand the reviewer has made up their mind, so I will definitely take you up on it. I'll ping you once it's re-nominated. Per Exemplum 18:56, 2 September 2026 (UTC)

No worries. Your lead is somewhat long compared to the rest of the body. A trim for proportion might be in order, or leave it and expand the body. Something to consider? Viriditas (talk) 03:12, 3 September 2026 (UTC)

Women in Green's October 2026 Edit-a-thon

Hello Per exemplum:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2026!

Running from October 1 to 31, 2026, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films or organizations created by women) during the event period — and this time, we are extending our focus to encourage more Did You Know (DYK) submissions spotlighting new GA articles about women and women's works. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by the event's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Alanna the Brave (talk) & Grnrchst (talk)

You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

(This message was sent to User talk:Ppt91 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)