Jump to content

User talk:Epicgenius

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Accessedgrant)
Latest comment: 10 hours ago by ThadeusOfNazereth in topic Your nomination of Darwin D. Martin House has passed








Click here to scroll to the bottom of the page.



dyk

[edit]

Hey, Epicgenius! So here's the thing about dyk: if you haven't created preps, you have no idea what prep-setters and admins at dyk do or what challenges they face. Many editors who are regular nominators and reviewers think they'd be willing to admin, but have never filled preps, and when they become admins and start moving preps to queues, they quickly realize they didn't know what they were volunteering for. A prep-setter doesn't just create a balanced set. They also do a quick re-review on many of the hooks; you get to know whose hooks you don't have to review too heavily, but you always have to at least go check for a recent edit war or tags. If the nominator or the reviewer are new or known to be sloppy, you'll have to do a full re-review of that hook. Often prep-setters have questions they have to ask at the hook, and they deal with pushback from noms/reviewers/passersby for that. Then once you've finished a prep you have to deal with fallout at DYK talk and ERRORS. Admins do the exact same thing -- a re-review, because prep-setters miss things too, then the move (fairly simple), posting questions at DYK talk and pinging involved parties, dealing with pushback from them, and finally any fallout at ERRORS when someone finds an error you missed. So if you think you would be willing to admin at dyk, definitely go fill preps for a while to see if you like it or not. Some people love it -- I did, and I like adminning there -- but not everyone is cut out for it. It's a high-visibility job. People catch your mistakes, and the only way to prevent that is to catch other people's mistakes first. —valereee (talk) 15:20, 5 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Valereee, thanks for the advice. That is good to know. I think this sort of stuff should be enjoyable for me, even if a bit difficult. I just read the project page on prep areas, and it seems a bit difficult to get a good balance on hooks. epicgenius (talk) 15:23, 5 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
That's one of the most fun parts of setting preps. The thing to do for your first prep is pick the bottom empty set (which right now gives you three days to fill it but normally six days.) Count to figure out whether the image hook needs a bio or a non-bio (it alternates by day). Go find one, vet it, and transfer it. That'll let the other prep setters know you'll fill that set. Not that they or an admin won't move stuff in and out if they need it or think another set is better for that hook, but in general one prep-setter works on a set. Then start putting the puzzle together -- no more than four bios (alternating in the set with non-bio), no more than one music/science/military/whatever subject. Not too many from any one country, though 2 - 4 USA hooks will be necessary. A balance of geographical area, not all from English-speaking countries. A balance of long and short. And of course a quirky. It's an art. Don't be afraid to trim or tweak hooks, but read the nom first if you do, as there may have already been discussion. Keep on top of talk in case someone asks a question about one of the hooks in that set, because some people won't realize they need to ping you as the promoter. :) Ping me any time, and Yoninah will often leave pointers on how to improve at your talk. When she stops, you know you're getting near the point of competence. :) —valereee (talk) 15:47, 5 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Happy Holidays

[edit]
Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, people's rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of serenity without social tension. Happy Holidays to you and yours. ―Buster7 ☎

Subway articles

[edit]

Once again, very impressive work on very important station complex and line articles. There is more to be added about the change in BMT plans re:Canal Street. Eventually, Clark Street Tunnel should be its own article. Also, the citations for IRT Broadway–Seventh Avenue Line are really messed up and include self-published sources like nycsubway.org, and there is more history that could be added. A lot of my older GA nominations should be looked at again for things like this. Also, for Union Square, it is worth mentioning the impromptu 9/11 memorial, and the post-2016 election post-it notes (https://mashable.com/article/power-of-post-it-note-protest-subway-therapy, https://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/post-it-notes-left-union-square-election-preserved-article-1.2913344, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/12/19/post-election-subway-therapy-sticky-notes-taken-down-but-not-thrown-out/, https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/16/nyregion/subway-election-therapy-wall-sticky-notes.html). Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 14:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Kew Gardens 613, the pleasure is mine. I do agree that the Clark Street Tunnel should get its own page in the future. I've also noticed that there's a lot more that can be said about the Broadway-Seventh Avenue Line, especially its construction, and will have to work on it gradually. The biggest mess, though, is the Canal Street article - there are a lot of details about the BMT station that are just not mentioned at the moment, and the article in general needs more refs.
As for the Union Square station, the article already mentions both the 9/11 memorial and the post-it wall (the second paragraph of 14th Street–Union Square station#Artwork). I thought one paragraph would be sufficient, seeing as how the artwork was not sanctioned by the MTA but seems to be covered by multiple reliable sources. – Epicgenius (talk) 14:38, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
I fully agree. I missed it somehow. Don't forget the Stantec studies, like the one that found making Clark Street accessible was infeasible, and which provides some sourcing for station layout (i.e. platform length/width). Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 15:17, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
It also is probably worth mentioning the 1990 fire in the Clark Street article. Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 15:30, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
I agree and can get around to that soon. In the meantime, I was looking at the study for Union Square, which says: This technology does not meet ADA standards, and since there is currently no technology that does, there is no fully accessible solution for the southbound platform. We are including an option for providing elevator service to this platform in this report with the understanding that this will not provide a fully accessible solution at this time. So I suppose this means the southbound platform can get an elevator, it just won't be ADA-accessible because gap fillers, by their very nature, are ADA-inaccessible. – Epicgenius (talk) 15:47, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Yeah. Also, unrelated, but the 1990 Clark Street Tunnel fire was very notable, and there were major reports done on fire safety/communication, etc. in its aftermath. It would warrant an article of its own. Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 16:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
I also think the 1990 Clark Street fire should get its own article. (I think the fire happened just east of the Clark Street station, though, not in the tunnel under the river.) In terms of recent NYC Subway disasters, the fire has had at least as much of an impact as the 1991 Union Square derailment or the 1995 Williamsburg Bridge subway collision did. – Epicgenius (talk) 17:11, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Also-the provisions in the Eastern Parkway Line used for the Clark Street Tunnel connection were initially intended for a line over the Manhattan Bridge. Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 14:27, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
That is interesting. If we can find a reliable source for this, I could add it to the Borough Hall or Eastern Parkway Line articles. – Epicgenius (talk) 14:35, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
I have seen reliable sources for this-if you cannot find them, I can look for them after I get my final paper for the semester done today. Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 14:49, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
I started a draft Clark Street Tunnel article here: User:Kew Gardens 613/sandbox 7#Clark Street Tunnel. Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 14:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Have you seen this article before? Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 16:53, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Kew Gardens 613, I have, but thanks for clipping it. The first part of that source seems to largely duplicate the New York Herald Tribune ref that's already in the Fulton Street station article. But it has some info that isn't mentioned in the NYHT source, specifically the 535-foot length of the station. The second part of the source could be used for the Broad Street station article though. – Epicgenius (talk) 17:00, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Outstanding work on the article. We really shouldn't be using The Station Reporter as a source. Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 18:44, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
There is stuff to be added about flooding/water intrusion problems at Canal. Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 17:52, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
There was a report put out. I found two articles I had clipped (https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-new-york-times/98305321/, https://www.newspapers.com/article/times-union/99774843/) Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 17:57, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
I agree. I've noticed quite a bit of info about how Canal Street's proximity to the old Collect Pond contributed to tons of water problems there. I can add these sources in later. – Epicgenius (talk) 18:04, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
It was a paper, not a report. I haven't found it online. Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 18:14, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
I found it. Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 18:18, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
This journal is a great source for construction details. I found one article with details on underpinning and other aspects of subway construction from 1919, one on sewer siphons, SI transportation, and Columbus Circle construction Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 18:40, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
That's very interesting. I might have to look through this journal to, um, shore up some architectural articles as well. That Canal Street article was really detailed, and I expect the others will be no different. – Epicgenius (talk) 18:46, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Also one on train dispatching, the Manhattan Bridge Plaza, and the ENY tunnel Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 18:57, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Sorry for spamming here, but also Joralemon, and here, excavation, the Atlantic Av improvement, and Brighton Line improvements Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 19:08, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
No problem. I will just add all these links to a subsection of User:Epicgenius/sandbox/to do, where we can both track it easily. – Epicgenius (talk) 21:59, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Signaling, car design, and ventilation, and IRT track design as well Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 18:47, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
There is this thorough masterpiece on Dual Contracts construction. Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 19:15, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Bumping thread for 30 days. Epicgenius (talk) 22:32, 27 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Bumping thread for 60 days. Epicgenius (talk) 16:30, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Bumping thread for 360 days. Epicgenius (talk) 17:03, 11 September 2023 (UTC) – Epicgenius (talk) 17:03, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Kew Gardens 613, by the way, we might want to flesh out User:Epicgenius/sandbox/article-draft1, my sandbox on the Manhattan Bridge subway closure. I'm planning to bring the Manhattan Bridge article to GA, which will probably require condensing the Manhattan Bridge#Trackage history section, and the closures are a notable topic that I've been meaning to finish writing about for a while. – Epicgenius (talk) 23:12, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Epicgenius I have been very busy, but, when I have a chance, will try to get back to this. Amazing work on all the bridge articles. Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 13:17, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
The 2025-2029 Capital Program recently came out. Some articles may need to be updated to reflect this. – Epicgenius (talk) 13:42, 19 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Updating the complex articles (since they are all extremely short)

[edit]

1 World Trade Center

[edit]
  • Needs history section
  • Needs design section, which I will write shortly
  • Needs destruction section
  • "List of tenants" may need to be split to a separate article due to length
  • "92nd Floor" section needs removed and incorporated into above "Destruction" section

2 World Trade Center

[edit]
  • Needs history section
  • Needs design section
  • Needs destruction section
  • Potentially needs rewrite, after reading it I spotted a few errors

3 World Trade Center

[edit]
  • Actually has a history section, but needs expanded
  • Rewrite Destruction section
  • May need a "design" section

4 World Trade Center

[edit]
  • Has history and destruction sections
  • Both need expanded
  • More images needed

5 World Trade Center

[edit]
  • Half of the article is about 9/11, meaning half of the article is about 1 day when the structure existed for 31 years
  • Needs a design section
  • Either the gallery section needs removed or expanded to comply with MOS, it's currently just 3 images chilling around

6 World Trade Center

[edit]

7 World Trade Center

[edit]
  • Needs architecture section
  • Needs more history pre-2001
  • The destruction section may need to be summarized per WP:SUMSTYLE

I added the above subheaders just in case we need a list of things to do. :) Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 16:36, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Sir MemeGod: Thanks for starting this section. I might move this to User:Epicgenius/sandbox/to do when we're done figuring out what to do (since idk where else to put it). Epicgenius (talk) 16:41, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
By the way, Construction of the World Trade Center has some info about the Twin Towers' structural design, so we can copy some of the relevant info into these articles. – Epicgenius (talk) 16:46, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

DYK for 133 East 80th Street

[edit]

On 8 October 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 133 East 80th Street, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the top of a Manhattan apartment building was likened to a "mountain castle redoubt in a Harry Potter movie"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/133 East 80th Street. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (133 East 80th Street), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 00:02, 8 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hook update
Your hook reached 16,695 views (695.6 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of October 2026 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 9 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

October 2026 Administrator Elections – Discussion Phase

[edit]

The discussion phase of the October 2026 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • October 8–12: Discussion phase (we are here)
  • October 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase
  • Scrutineering phase

We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2026/Discussion phase.

On 13 Oct, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for.

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 8 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

sortcategories.js adds unnecessary newline

[edit]

Hello again! While sortcategories.js still is as great as ever, I noticed recently that the script now adds a second newline before the list of categories whenever there isn't a DEFAULTSORT anywhere. Furthermore, and I reckon I made you do this, but the double-newline between categories and stub cats (WP:STUBSPACING) was recently changed to only require one newline, as the templates were amended instead. I believe the affected code is in ll. 175-182 and may be correct as follows:

−
if (wpTextbox1_V.indexOf(defaultSort) < 0) { textWithCategories = "\n" + textWithCategories; } if (wpTextbox1_V.indexOf(stubTag) >= 0) { textWithCategories = textWithCategories + "\n\n"; }
+
if (wpTextbox1_V.indexOf(stubTag) >= 0) { textWithCategories = textWithCategories + "\n"; }

Regards, IceWelder [✉] 17:16, 9 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

@IceWelder, thanks for bringing it up. I modified it so that all existing newlines are replaced with:
  • 0 blank lines before the first category if there is a {{DEFAULTSORT}}, 1 blank line otherwise
  • 1 blank line after the last category if a stub template is detected
  • Also, any incorrectly capitalized categories (e.g. cAtegory) should now also be detected and corrected.
– Epicgenius (talk) 18:00, 9 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Looks great, thanks! IceWelder [✉] 18:26, 9 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

New cross-language page link: World Trade Center (1973–2001)

[edit]

A new page World Trade Center (1973–2001) on the Interlingua Wikipedia has been linked to the page World Trade Center (1973–2001), which you created, via Wikidata (Q11235).

You will not be notified about future links to pages you created. To opt in to these notifications, follow the opt-in instructions.

NervousBot (talk) 07:29, 11 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

The redirect DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel MetropolitanDoubleTree Metropolitan Hotel has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 October 11 § DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel MetropolitanDoubleTree Metropolitan Hotel until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:16, 11 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Oct 20 Opening (Access) Night with EFF + Oct 30 Wikidata Day NYC

[edit]
When: October 20, 2026
Where: Prime Produce
Time: 5:00pm to 8:00pm
Note: This gathering replaces October's WikiWednesday Salon. Prime Produce is at 424 West 54th Street.
When: October 30, 2026
Where: Pratt Institute School of Information
Time: 2:00pm to 6:00pm
This event marks the 14th Birthday of Wikidata with a celebration and mini-conference. Sign up for a lightning talk or presentation and view the most up to date schedule on the Wikipedia event registration page!

All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct and Photography Policy.

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:39, 11 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Cedar Rock State Park

[edit]

On 12 October 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cedar Rock State Park, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Lowell E. Walter House has a garden in the floor of its living room? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cedar Rock State Park. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (Cedar Rock State Park), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 00:03, 12 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

"Decline of detroit" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Decline of detroit has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 October 12 § Decline of detroit until a consensus is reached. Home Lander (talk) 23:19, 12 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Charlie Parker Residence

[edit]

On 13 October 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Charlie Parker Residence, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when the residence (pictured) of musician Charlie "Bird" Parker was nominated for New York City landmark designation, one person sent a bird feather to the city government in support? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Charlie Parker Residence. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (Charlie Parker Residence), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 00:02, 13 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

October 2026 Administrator Elections – Voting Phase

[edit]

The voting phase of the October 2026 administrator elections has started and will continue until 19 October 2026 at 23:59 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2026/Voting phase.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • October 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase (we are here)
  • Scrutineering phase

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote has a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for a few days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a non-recall candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Recall candidates must achieve 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 13 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Danbury Railway Museum

[edit]

Could you take a look at Danbury Railway Museum and possibly protect it? There's been a string of railfans there (and at GE Genesis) breathlessly posting about an alleged locomotive donation. TriStateGuy seems unwilling to understand that Reddit is not a reliable source despite my best attempts, and I don't wish to get dinged for edit warring. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:04, 14 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Pi.1415926535, since technically both of you are edit warring, I've fully protected the page for one day. It's not the ideal outcome, as the WP:WRONGVERSION would inevitably have been protected, but unfortunately WP:3RRNO does not make exception for material that is merely poorly sourced (as opposed to something like unambiguous spam, vandalism, BLP, or copyright violations) – Epicgenius (talk) 04:04, 14 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Epicgenius: Thanks for taking a look. Hopefully either something reliable will be published by tomorrow, or the railfans will find something else to focus on. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 15:42, 14 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your nomination of Darwin D. Martin House is under review

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Darwin D. Martin House is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ThadeusOfNazereth -- ThadeusOfNazereth (talk) 19:43, 15 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Manhattan Club

[edit]

Adjoined to Park Central Hotel. I was going to have a stab at an article for it. Think it would be worthwhile? There's a fair amount of material on it, not least History of the Manhattan Club (1915). Edit: Ah. That was regarding Manhattan Club (social club); different establishment. Seasider53 (talk) 20:27, 16 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Seasider53, if you decide to do this, good luck. I just searched "Manhattan Club" on ProQuest, and it gave me 28,000 results, most of which are for various lowercase-c Manhattan clubs.
I don't even think I can even find the uppercase-c Manhattan Club you're looking for, The Park Central Hotel article says that "Eichner converted half the hotel's 1,450 rooms into the Manhattan Club", which brings up more questions than it answers - was there another Manhattan Club next to the Park Central Manhattan Club? In any case, the hotel's Manhattan Club is indeed completely different from Manhattan Club (social club). – Epicgenius (talk) 20:58, 16 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Arthur Heurtley House

[edit]

On 17 October 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Arthur Heurtley House, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that one former owner of Frank Lloyd Wright's Arthur Heurtley House (pictured) bought it after reading a book about Wright's work? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Arthur Heurtley House. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (Arthur Heurtley House), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Launchballer 00:02, 17 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

story · music · places

Thank you for this one with a hook that interests me! And then two DYK one set! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:03, 17 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Pier 57

[edit]

On 17 October 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pier 57, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a building occupied by Google was variously used as a shipping pier, bus depot, and detention center? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pier 57. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (Pier 57), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Launchballer 00:03, 17 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your nomination of Darwin D. Martin House is on hold

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Darwin D. Martin House has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ThadeusOfNazereth -- ThadeusOfNazereth (talk) 01:22, 18 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your nomination of Darwin D. Martin House has passed

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Darwin D. Martin House has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ThadeusOfNazereth -- ThadeusOfNazereth (talk) 00:03, 19 October 2026 (UTC)Reply